Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DR.ABDUL RASHEED E.M. versus THE STATE OF KERALA , REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


DR.ABDUL RASHEED E.M. v. THE STATE OF KERALA , REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 5 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 244 (4 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5 of 2007()

1. DR.ABDUL RASHEED E.M.,
... Petitioner

2. SAKEENA, W/O.MUJEEB,

3. ALAVIKUTTY HAJI, S/O.MOMMEDKUTTY,

4. SULAIKHA, W/O.ALAVIKUTTY HAJI,

5. AHAMMEDKUTTY, W/O.KOYAMMU,

Vs

1. THE STATE OF KERALA , REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

For Petitioner :SRI.BABU S. NAIR

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :04/01/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bail Application NO.5 of 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 4th day of January, 2007.

O R D E R

Petitioners, who are accused Nos. 1 to 5 in Crime No.204 of 2006 of Surathkal Police Station, Karnataka State for an offence punishable under Section 498 A read with Section 34 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail. The petitioners are the husband, his brother's wife, his parents and his uncle. The case has originated on a private complaint filed by Dr.Sajna, wife of the first petitioner.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioners on bail for a period of one month in the event of their arrest in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions: BA 5/07 -: 2 :-

1. Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

2. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

3. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

4. Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE.

ess 4/1 BA 5/07 -: 3 :-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.