Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MUNNA, S/O. MOHAMMED @ KULLA MOHAMMED versus THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


MUNNA, S/O. MOHAMMED @ KULLA MOHAMMED v. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 584 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 2497 (2 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 584 of 2007()

1. MUNNA, S/O. MOHAMMED @ KULLA MOHAMMED,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :02/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 584 OF 2007 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2007

O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner, who is the 2nd accused in Crime No.712/00 of Kasaragod Police Station for offences punishable under Secs.143, 147, 148, 427 and 153A read with section 149 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Admittedly, consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioner before the CJM, Kasaragod in C.C.No.13/2003, the case against him has been split up and transferred to the LPC register as LPC.No.156/06. After the disposal of C.C.No.13/03, the case against the petitioner has been re-filed as C.C.No.500/06. Admittedly, a non- bailable warrant is pending against the petitioner. According to the petitioner, the co-accused in the case has been acquitted after trial. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the CJM, Kasaragod and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the CJM, Kasaragod and BA.584/07 2 files an application for regular bail within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of despite the NBW, if any, pending against him, preferably on the same day on such an application for bail is filed, after examining the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-appearance, after considering his contentions that the co-accused in the case has been acquitted. This petition is disposed of as above.

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

aks


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.