Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

THULASEEDHARAN PILLAI versus STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


THULASEEDHARAN PILLAI v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 457 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 2536 (2 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 457 of 2007()

1. THULASEEDHARAN PILLAI,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.T.GOPALAKRISHNAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :02/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 457 OF 2007 B ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2007

O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner, who is the accused in C.R. No.10/2007 of Karunagappally Excise Range for an offence punishable under Sec. 55(a) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 7.5 liters of IMFL on 8.1.2007, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Eventhough the Public Prosecutor opposed the application, he confessed that the prosecution records do not allege that the IMFL found in the possession of the petitioner was meant for sale for which an offence punishable under section 55(a) or (i) is not made out in the light

of the decision of this court reported in Sabu Vs. State of Kerala [2003

(2) KLT 1003]. I am, therefore, inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the investigating officer concerned to release the petitioner on bail for a period of one month in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two BA.457/07 2 solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions:

a. Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11

a.m. on all Wednesdays.

b. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

c. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

d. Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

e. Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

aks


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.