Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

TONY SIMON, S/O. SIMON versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


TONY SIMON, S/O. SIMON v. STATE OF KERALA-REPRESENTED BY THE - Bail Appl No. 578 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 2537 (2 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 578 of 2007()

1. TONY SIMON, S/O. SIMON,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA-REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.M.SREEKUMAR

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :02/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 578 OF 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2007

O R D E R

Petitioner who is the 3rd accused in Crime No.170/01 of Valiyathura Police Station for offences punishable under sections 323, 324 and 326 read with section 34 IPC, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.195/02 on the file of the Court of the C.J.M., Thiruvananthapuram the case against him was split up and transferred to the long pending register where it has been registered as L.P.No.48/05. After the disposal of C.C.No.195/02, the case against the petitioner has been refiled as C.C.No.88/05.

3. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. The petitioner has a contention that the co-accused in the case has been acquitted after trial. If the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned and files an application for regular bail, within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably on the same date on BA.578/07 Page numbers which it is filed after examining the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-appearance and also after considering the contention of the petitioner that the co-accused in the case has been acquitted after trial. This application is disposed of as above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

dsn


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.