Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJESH P.M. versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RAJESH P.M. v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - WP(C) No. 4065 of 2007(H) [2007] RD-KL 2725 (6 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 4065 of 2007(H)

1. RAJESH P.M.,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR,

For Petitioner :SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

Dated :06/02/2007

O R D E R

K.K.DENESAN, J.

WP(C)No. 4065 OF 2007

Dated this the 6th February, 2007.



JUDGMENT

The petitioner is working as Watchman in the Government Industrial Training Institute, Kannur. Ext.P6 representation filed by him is pending with the second respondent. The point arising for consideration as seen from Ext.P6 is the determination of the seniority of the petitioner with reference to the first effective advice in the category to which he has been appointed. The petitioner contends that instead of determining his seniority with reference to the date of his second advice for re-entry into the service, it should run from the date of first effective advice.

2. I have heard Govt. Pleader also.

3. The second respondent has got a duty to consider Ext.P6 in accordance with law and take appropriate decision.

4. In the circumstances, the second respondent is directed to consider Ext.P6 based on the provisions contained in Rule 27 of Part II K.S & S.S.R, and to take decision in accordance with law. Before passing orders on Ext.P6, the views of the Public Service Commission in the matter also shall be sought for by the second respondent WPC 4065/2007 2 after furnishing to the Public Service Commission all relevant aspects. The Commission shall consider the same and reply to the second respondent at its earliest. Final decision shall be taken on Ext.P6 within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. K.K.DENESAN Judge jj


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.