Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

REGHU K.K., KATTARKUDIYIL HOUSE versus THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE HOUSING

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


REGHU K.K., KATTARKUDIYIL HOUSE v. THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE HOUSING - WP(C) No. 3717 of 2007(P) [2007] RD-KL 2729 (6 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 3717 of 2007(P)

1. REGHU K.K., KATTARKUDIYIL HOUSE,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE HOUSING
... Respondent

2. THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA STATE HOUSING

For Petitioner :SRI.K.M.KURIAN

For Respondent :POOVAPPALLY M.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,SC.KSHB

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

Dated :06/02/2007

O R D E R

K.K. DENESAN, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 3717 OF 2007 P = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Dated this the 6th February, 2007



J U D G M E N T

Heard counsel for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioner has been placed under suspension as per Ext. P2 order dated 28-3-2005 passed by the 1st respondent. Immediately thereafter, Ext. P5 representation was filed by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent requesting to revoke the order of suspension and reinstate him in service. No order has been passed on Ext. P5 representation dated 16-6-2005. On 25-9-2006 the petitioner has filed Ext. P7 representation once again requesting to reinstate him in service. The 2nd respondent has not taken any decision on Ext. P7 also.

2. Counsel for the respondents submits that appropriate orders will be passed on Exts. P5 and P7 without further delay.

3. In the circumstances, it is necessary that the respondents shall be directed to take decision within a time frame. The 2nd respondent is directed to consider WPC No.3717 /2007 -2- Exts. P5 and P7 with reference to relevant records and on merits and to pass orders in accordance with law within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for information and compliance. K.K. DENESAN

JUDGE

jan/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.