Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAJAHAN, S/O.ABDUL MAJEED versus SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODAKKAL

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SHAJAHAN, S/O.ABDUL MAJEED v. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODAKKAL - Bail Appl No. 571 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 2735 (6 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 571 of 2007()

1. SHAJAHAN, S/O.ABDUL MAJEED,
... Petitioner

2. ABDUL JALEEL,

3. NAZIR,

4. NIZAR, S/O.ABDUL MAJEED,

5. ANZAR,

Vs

1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODAKKAL,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :06/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No.571 of 2007

DATED: FEBRUARY 6, 2007

O R D E R

Petitioners who are accused Nos.1 to 5 in Crime No.37/2007 of Kadakkal Police Station for offences punishable under secs. 420, 341, 323, 324, 94(b) and 506(i) read with sec120(B) I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the de facto complainant.

3. The de facto complainant and the petitioners are close relatives. The allegation in the complaint is that the 1st accused had received Rs.3.10 lakhs from the de facto complainant for purchasing 3 cents of property jointly in the name of one Abdul Jaleel and the de facto complainant, but the 1st accused purchased the property in his name only.

4. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioners on bail for a period of one month in the event of their arrest in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the said officer and subject to the following conditions:- Bail A.No.571/2007 -:2:-

1. Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

3. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

5. Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile.

6. Petitioners 1, 3 and 4 shall surrender their passports, if any, to the investigating officer who shall forward the same to the concerned Magistrate. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

mt/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.