Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SAJEESH, S/O.MADHANAN versus STATE OF KERALA REP. BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SAJEESH, S/O.MADHANAN v. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY - Bail Appl No. 660 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 2868 (7 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 660 of 2007()

1. SAJEESH, S/O.MADHANAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.BIJU M.JOHN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :07/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No.660 of 2007

DATED: FEBRUARY 7, 2007

O R D E R

Petitioner who is the 1st accused in Crime No.305/2006 of CBCID, Idukki (originally registered as Crime Nos.192/2006 206/2006 of Vellathooval Police Station) for offences punishable under secs.366, 376, 306 and 511 of 376 rad with sec.34 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner surrendered before the magistrate concerned on 31.10.2006 and was remanded to judicial custody where he continues.

2. Sri P.G.Thampi, the Director General of Prosecutions, vehemently opposed the application submitting inter alia that this is a case of gang rape in which the petitioner is the most despicable person as he had satiated his lust in the girl after misrepresenting to her that he was a bachelor when the fact remains that he was a married man having two children. Sri Thampi also highlighted the fact that the girl was in sincere and ardent love with the 1st accused who had betrayed her in the most foul manner and the jilted girl had ultimately no other alternative but to commit suicide on being forsaken by the petitioner who was masquerading as her lover.

3. If the prosecution is able to prove the allegations against the petitioner, then probably he may deserve the most condign punishment. But the petitioner has been in custody since 31.10.2006. This is too long a period for pre-trial incarceration. Having regard to the nature of the offence, the duration of Bail A.No.660/2007 -:2:- judicial custody of the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M., Adimaly, and subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report.

3. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

mt/- Bail A.No.660/2007 -:3:-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.