Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MUKKATH PAPPACHAN @ M.M.MATHEW versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


MUKKATH PAPPACHAN @ M.M.MATHEW v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE - Bail Appl No. 752 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 3036 (9 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 752 of 2007()

1. MUKKATH PAPPACHAN @ M.M.MATHEW,
... Petitioner

2. RAJU K.P., S/O. PAULOSE, AGED 41 YEARS,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM)

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :09/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BAIL APPLICATION NOs. 752/07 & 753/07
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2007

O R D E R

The common petitioners in these applications for regular bail are accused 1 and 2 in O.R.No.2/07 of Peruvannamuzhy Forest Range for offences punishable under sections 2, 9, 39, 51 and 57 of the Wild Life Protection Act and section 27 of the Forest Act and accused 1 and 2 in Crime No.13/07 of Peruvannamuzhy Police Station for an offence punishable under section 3 read with section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

3. The case of the prosecution is that some time prior to 15.1.2007, the petitioners armed with guns had trespassed into the reserve forest and killed a sambar deer, the meat of which was shared between them. One of the guns recovered from the petitioners was an unlicensed gun. 50 Kgs of meat of the sambar deer was also seized from them. Both of them were arrested on 15.1.2007.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the duration of judicial custody of the petitioners,I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners only with effect from a future date. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail with effect from B.A.NOs.752 & 753/07 :Page numbers: 21.2.2007 on each of them executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M., Perambra and subject to the following conditions:

1. The petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the Police, till the filing of the final report.

3. The petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. The petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

dsn


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.