Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

A.SHAJAHAN versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


A.SHAJAHAN v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 813 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 3075 (12 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 813 of 2007()

1. A.SHAJAHAN,
... Petitioner

2. A.BASHEER,

3. A.ABDUL BASHEED,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :12/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 813 OF 2007 B ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Dated this the 12th day of February, 2007

O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.135/2005 of Kasaba Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 341 and 324 read with section 34 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail. The petitioners were granted bail after cognizance by the JFCM-I, Palakkad in C.C. No.348/2005. Subsequently, consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioners, their bail was cancelled. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioners. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioners should not surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioners surrender before the JFCM-I, Palakkad and file an application for regular bail, within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably on the same date on which it is filed, after considering the explanation offered by the petitioners for their previous non-appearance, notwithstanding warrants, if any, pending against the petitioners. This application is disposed of as above.

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

aks


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.