Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DHANUDAS.M. versus STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


DHANUDAS.M. v. STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE - Bail Appl No. 734 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 3096 (12 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 734 of 2007()

1. DHANUDAS.M.,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.SUNNY MATHEW

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :12/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

B. A. No.734 of 2007

DATED: FEBRUARY 12, 2007

O R D E R

Petitioner who is the 1st accused in Crime No.229/2006 of Chakkarakkal Police Station for an offence punishable under Sec.395 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place at about 4.15 p.m. on 27.11.2006. The petitioner was arrested on 25.12.2006.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

3. The case of the petitioner is that on 27.11.2006 at about 4.15 p.m. the petitioner along with six other persons came in an Omni van and assaulted the de facto complainant causing him injuries and robbed him of cash worth Rs.42000/-.

4. Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody of the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M., Thalassery, and subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as Bail A.No.734/2007 -:2:- and when required by the police till the filing of the final report.

3. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

mt/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.