Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAJI ALIAS KAMARU, S/O.ALI AHAMMED versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SHAJI ALIAS KAMARU, S/O.ALI AHAMMED v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 806 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 3175 (12 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 806 of 2007()

1. SHAJI ALIAS KAMARU, S/O.ALI AHAMMED,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :12/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 806 OF 2007 A ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Dated this the 12th day of February, 2007

O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner, who is the first accused in Crime No.282/2006 of Ernakulam Town South Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application submitting, inter alia, that an earlier application filed by the petitioner before this court as B.A. No.4706/2006 was dismissed by this court.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, who runs a brothel, had brought accused Nos.2 and 3 (girls from Andhra Pradesh) to a house at Chilavannur at Ernakulam and had made them available to his customers namely, accused Nos.5 to 7, for immoral sexual activities. Apart from the fact that this court was not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is inevitable for unfolding the ramification of the racket. I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. There is no reason why the petitioner BA.806/07 2 should not surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned and files an application for regular bail, within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably on the same date on which it is filed. This application is disposed of as above.

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

aks


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.