Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SREEKANTH, AGED 20 YEARS versus STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SREEKANTH, AGED 20 YEARS v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS - Bail Appl No. 815 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 3185 (12 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 815 of 2007()

1. SREEKANTH, AGED 20 YEARS,
... Petitioner

2. SANTHOSH, AGED 32 YEARS,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS
... Respondent

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.D.KISHORE

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :12/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 815 OF 2007 B ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Dated this the 12th day of February, 2007

O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioners, who are the accused in Crime No.26/2007 of Kodumon Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 353 and 323 read with section 34 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. In as much as a counter case has also been registered in respect of the very same occurrence as Crime No.27/2007 for similar offences, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioners on bail for a period of one month in the event of their arrest in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions:

a. Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11

a.m. on all Wednesdays. BA.815/07 2

b. Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

c. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

d. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

e. Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

aks


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.