Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

G. SATHYMONY, SONA LAND versus THE AUTHORISED OFFICER/CHIEF MANAGER

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


G. SATHYMONY, SONA LAND v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER/CHIEF MANAGER - WP(C) No. 31552 of 2006(F) [2007] RD-KL 3427 (15 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 31552 of 2006(F)

1. G. SATHYMONY, SONA LAND,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER/CHIEF MANAGER,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.M.TRIPTEN

For Respondent :SRI.SATHISH NINAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

Dated :15/02/2007

O R D E R

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J

W.P(C).No.31552 OF 2006

Dated this the 15th day of February, 2007



JUDGMENT

The petitioner have been proceeded under the SARFAESI Act, which appears to be for an amount around Rupees Fourteen Lakhs. It is now pointed out that during the pendency of the writ petition, the bank had agreed to close off the loan account, if the petitioner remits an amount of Rupees Eight Lakhs on or before 28.2.2007. The request of the petitioner is that she may be granted an One Time Settlement. Thus, obviously, considering that application that the bank had taken a decision to slash down the amount from Rs.14,00,000/- to Rs.8,00,000/-. Under such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing that if the petitioner pays an amount of Rs.8,00,000/- on or before 31.3.2007, along with interest at commercial rate for one month, i.e., for the month of March, 2007, the matter will be treated as settled and the account closed. If otherwise, the offer made by the bank would stand recalled and the petitioner, WPC.31552/06 Page numbers if she is so advised, will work out her remedies, if any, available to her under the framework of the SARFAESI Act. It is clarified that there are no further interlocutory orders issued as part of this judgment to bind parties after 30.3.2007. If remittance as aforesaid is not made, entire amounts due under the SARFAESI Act can be recovered. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN Judge kkb.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.