Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

A.FIROZ, S/O.ALIKUNJU SASTRY versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


A.FIROZ, S/O.ALIKUNJU SASTRY v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE - Bail Appl No. 635 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 3514 (19 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 635 of 2007()

1. A.FIROZ, S/O.ALIKUNJU SASTRY,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

3. THE DETECTIVE INSPECTOR,

For Petitioner :SRI.M.SREEKUMAR

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :19/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 635 OF 2007 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Dated this the 19th day of February, 2007

O R D E R

Petitioner, who is the 3rd accused in Crime No.1/2006 of Central Crime Branch-III, Egmore, Chennai for an offence punishable under section 420 read with section 34 IPC, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application submitting, inter alia, that accused Nos.1 to 3 had cheated the de facto complainant by inducing him to part with large amounts of money by accused Nos.1 and 2 showing properties over which they have no title and that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is inevitable. Under these circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for interrogation and then have his application for regular bail considered by the Magistrate concerned. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Investigating Officer within two weeks from today for the purpose of custodial interrogation and recovery of incriminating materials, if any. The petitioner shall, thereafter, be produced before the concerned Magistrate, who shall consider and dispose of the application, if any, filed by the petitioner for regular bail, preferably on the same date on which it is filed. This application is disposed of as above.

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

aks


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.