Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHANIDA, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O. HUSSAIN versus MOHAMMED ABDUL SALIM, AGED 29 YEARS

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SHANIDA, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O. HUSSAIN v. MOHAMMED ABDUL SALIM, AGED 29 YEARS - WP(C) No. 1705 of 2007(C) [2007] RD-KL 3642 (19 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 1705 of 2007(C)

1. SHANIDA, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O. HUSSAIN
... Petitioner

Vs

1. MOHAMMED ABDUL SALIM, AGED 29 YEARS,
... Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE

For Petitioner :SRI.MANJERI SUNDERRAJ

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :19/02/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

W.P.C .No.1705 of 2007

Dated this the 19th day of February 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner has come to this court with the grievance that Protection Officers, as contemplated under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Act 43 of 2005) having not been appointed, the same is causing great prejudice and loss to the petitioner. The learned Magistrate is not taking the necessary steps to get the notice served on the first respondent for the reason that Protection Officer has not been appointed. It was with that grievance that the petitioner had come to this court. A report has been called for from the learned Magistrate and the report has been received.

2. In the meantime, it is submitted that Protection Officers have been appointed and the said grievance does not survive. Report of the learned Magistrate shows that the learned Magistrate entertains serious doubts as to whether the petition is maintainable and he wants the matter to be heard. The learned counsel for the petitioner had advanced arguments in part, it is mentioned. W.P.C.No.1705/07 2

3. I am of the opinion that the petitioner must appear before the learned Magistrate and advance arguments on the question of maintainability raised by the learned Magistrate. I do not think it necessary to express any opinion on the question on which the learned Magistrate wants the matter to be heard. The petitioner must appear before the learned Magistrate and advance his arguments whereupon the learned Magistrate shall take appropriate decision in the matter. It is reported by the learned Magistrate that the matter stands posted to 02/03/2007. The petitioner must appear before the learned Magistrate and make his submissions on that date.

4. With the above observations, this writ petition is dismissed.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr W.P.C.No.1705/07 3 W.P.C.No.1705/07 4

R.BASANT, J

C.R.R.P.No.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF JULY 2006 W.P.C.No.1705/07 6 I am satisfied that notice need not be issued to the first respondent. Now, considering the question raised, the learned Government Pleader takes notice to the second respondent. He shall take instructions. It shall be reported specifically to this court whether Protection Officer has been appointed to discharge his functions within the jurisdiction of the Kunnamangalam Police Station. Take instructions. Call on 22/01/2007.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.