Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SIVAPRASAD, S/O.CHANDAGADHAN versus SAUDHABEEVI, D/O.SUBAIDHA BEEVI

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SIVAPRASAD, S/O.CHANDAGADHAN v. SAUDHABEEVI, D/O.SUBAIDHA BEEVI - WP(C) No. 2724 of 2007(Y) [2007] RD-KL 3646 (19 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 2724 of 2007(Y)

1. SIVAPRASAD, S/O.CHANDAGADHAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. SAUDHABEEVI, D/O.SUBAIDHA BEEVI,
... Respondent

2. AHAMMED, OTTAPLAVILA VEEDU,

3. NAVAS, SHABIJA MANZIL, KOTTIYAM,

4. KUNJUAHAMMED HAJI, S/O.ABDULLA,

5. JAYAKUMAR, SUB INSPECTOR,

6. VASUDEVAN, ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR,

7. D.RAJAN, CIRCLE INSPECTOR,

For Petitioner :SRI.C.RAJENDRAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :19/02/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

W.P(C).No.2724 of 2007

Dated this the 19th day of February, 2007



JUDGMENT

The grievance of the petitioner, who is the complainant in a prosecution, inter alia, under Section 420 read with 34 I.P.C is that the learned Magistrate is hurriedly proceeding with the trial of the case though the presence of the 7th accused has not been secured. No serious efforts have been made to procure the presence of the 7th accused so far though he had earlier entered appearance through counsel and had sought time to appear.

2. Report of the learned Magistrate was called for. The learned Magistrate reports that every effort is being made to secure the presence of the 7th accused. The case, I find, is an old one, the same having been registered as C.C.No.721 of 2004. I have no hesitation to agree with the learned counsel for the petitioner that every effort must be made by the learned Magistrate to secure the presence of the 7th accused before commencement of the trial and if such presence cannot be secured, splitting up of the case has got to be done in accordance with law and after observing the procedure in accordance with law. I accept the report of the learned Magistrate, wherein it is stated that the Director General of Police, Kerala has been addressed to secure the presence of the 7th accused on or before W.P(C).No.2724 of 2007 2 12.03.2007, the next date of posting of the case. No further directions appear to be necessary in this Writ Petition.

3. This Writ Petition is, accordingly dismissed.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

rtr/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.