High Court of Kerala
Case Law Search
N.KUNHALI, S/O. ABOOBACKER v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Crl MC No. 44 of 2007  RD-KL 386 (5 January 2007)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMCrl MC No. 44 of 2007()
1. N.KUNHALI, S/O. ABOOBACKER,
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
For Petitioner :SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT
O R D E R
R.BASANT, JCrl.M.C.No.44 of 2007
Dated this the 5th day of January, 2007
ORDERThe petitioner is the complainant in a prosecution under Section 138 of the N.I Act. According to him, an error had crept into the complaint. He filed an application for amendment of the complaint. The learned Magistrate dismissed that application. But the learned Magistrate cautiously observed that if the petitioner wants to clarify the mistake, he can do that at the time of evidence. In the light of that very specific statement which appears in the impugned order, I am satisfied, that it is not, at any rate, a fit case where this Court should invoke its powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C to interfere with the impugned order.
2. This Crl.M.C is, in these circumstances, dismissed. I may reiterate that the petitioner's liberty/option to explain the alleged mistake in the complaint in the course of evidence shall remain.
(R.BASANT, JUDGE)rtr/- 2
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.