Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KAPIL A. @ SHAJI, S/O. ALIYARKUNJU versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTING

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


KAPIL A. @ SHAJI, S/O. ALIYARKUNJU v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTING - Bail Appl No. 1007 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 3871 (21 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1007 of 2007()

1. KAPIL A. @ SHAJI, S/O. ALIYARKUNJU,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTING
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.G.PRIYADARSAN THAMPI

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :21/02/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BAIL APPLICATION NOs.1007/07 & 1017/07
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2007

O R D E R

The common petitioner in these applications for anticipatory bail is the 3rd accused in Crime No.592/06 and 1st accused in Crime No.16/07 of Alappuzha South Police Station. Crime No.592/06 has been registered for offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 324 and 506(ii), 326 and 308 read with section 149 IPC and the weapon involved is an axe. Crime No.16/07 has been registered for offences punishable under sections 324 and 308 read with section 34 IPC and the weapon involved is a sword stick.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application submitting, inter alia, that the petitioner is a habitual offender who takes revels in attacking Police officials and he is an accused in a murder case and an accused in an NDPS offence.

3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in cases of this nature. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Investigating Officer concerned for interrogation and then seek regular bail from the Magistrate. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Investigating Officer in both the above crimes on any day between 26.2.2007 and 28.2.2007 for the purpose of BA.Nos.1007/07 & 1017/07 Page numbers interrogation and recovery of incriminating materials, if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced before he Magistrate having jurisdiction on the same day. The Magistrate shall consider and dispose of the applications, if any, filed by the petitioner for regular bail, preferably on the same date on which such applications are filed. These petitions are disposed of as above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

dsn


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.