Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.M.KHALID, PRESIDENT versus THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.M.KHALID, PRESIDENT v. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE - WP(C) No. 38127 of 2003(L) [2007] RD-KL 4197 (26 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 38127 of 2003(L)

1. K.M.KHALID, PRESIDENT,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE

3. SMT. C.S.SANTHAMMA, SREEVALSOM VEEDU,

For Petitioner :SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR

For Respondent :SRI.T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

Dated :26/02/2007

O R D E R

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

W.P.(C) No.38127 of 2003 Dated 26th February, 2007.

J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is aggrieved by Exts.P6 and P8 orders in the matter of disciplinary proceedings initiated against the third respondent. There is no dispute that the disciplinary action against the third respondent, culminating originally in the termination, was subject matter of appeal leading to Ext.R3(a) resolution of the appeal committee. The resolution was to demote the third respondent and reinstate her in service. The Joint Registrar in the process, rescinded the resolution dated 21.12.1998 of the Sub Committee and directed reconsideration of the issue. The Government rejected the appeal. Since there is no appeal by the petitioner or there is no proceedings by the society against Ext.R3(a) resolution, since Ext.R3(a) resolution is by the appeal committee and since the third respondent only sought the implementation of Ext.R3(a), it is only just, reasonable and proper that Ext.R3(a) resolution of the appeal committee as such is given effect to. In other words, the third respondent should be reinstated in service after demoting her from the post of WP NO.38127/03 2 Secretary. The direction as above shall be implemented within one month from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Appropriate just orders on regularisation of the period the employee was kept out of service shall also be passed by the Society. The amount already paid to the petitioner shall be treated as costs. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.

tgs

KURIAN JOSEPH, J

O.P.No. of 2002

J U D G M E N T

Dated 26th February, 2007.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.