Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.P.FAIZAL, S/O.ABDULLA KUTTY versus STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.P.FAIZAL, S/O.ABDULLA KUTTY v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE - Bail Appl No. 976 of 2007(K) [2007] RD-KL 4351 (27 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 976 of 2007(K)

1. K.P.FAIZAL, S/O.ABDULLA KUTTY,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SMT.K.K.CHANDRALEKHA

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :27/02/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 976/2007 Dated this 27th day of February, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner who is the fifth accused in Crime No.229/2006 of Chakkarakkal Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 395 IPC seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

3. The case of the prosecution is that at about 4.15. p.m. on 27.11.2006, seven persons including the petitioner came in an Omini Van and assaulted the defacto complainant causing injuries to him and robbed him of cash worth Rs.42,000/-

4. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer and seek regular bail thereafter.

5. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Investigating Officer on any day between 5.3.2007 and 7.3.2007 for the purpose of B.A.976/2007 2 interrogation and recovery of incriminating materials if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced on the same day before the Magistrate having jurisdiction, who shall consider and dispose of the application, if any, filed by the petitioner for regular bail preferably on the same day on which it is filed. The application is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.