Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

THULASIDHARAN, S/O.SUKUMARAN versus THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


THULASIDHARAN, S/O.SUKUMARAN v. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY - Bail Appl No. 1108 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 4442 (27 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1108 of 2007()

1. THULASIDHARAN, S/O.SUKUMARAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :27/02/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 1108/2007 Dated this 27th day of February, 2007

O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner who is the accused in C.R. No.24/2007 of Nedumangad Excise Range for an offence punishable under Section 8(1) and (2) of the Abkari Act, for having been found in possession of five liters of illicit arrack, seeks his enlargement on bail. Petitioner was arrested on 2.2.2007.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the offence and the the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, but only from a future date. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from 5.3.2007, on his executing a bond for Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M-I, Nedumangadu and subject to the following conditions: B.A.1108/2007 2

(a). The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

(b). The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police.

(c). The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

(d). The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

4. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. The application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.