High Court of Kerala
Case Law Search
THULASIDHARAN, S/O.SUKUMARAN v. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY - Bail Appl No. 1108 of 2007  RD-KL 4442 (27 February 2007)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBail Appl No. 1108 of 2007()
1. THULASIDHARAN, S/O.SUKUMARAN,
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY
For Petitioner :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN
For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR
O R D E R
V.RAMKUMAR, J.Bail Application No. 1108/2007 Dated this 27th day of February, 2007
O R D E RIn this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner who is the accused in C.R. No.24/2007 of Nedumangad Excise Range for an offence punishable under Section 8(1) and (2) of the Abkari Act, for having been found in possession of five liters of illicit arrack, seeks his enlargement on bail. Petitioner was arrested on 2.2.2007.
2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. Having regard to the nature of the offence and the
the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined
bail to the petitioner, but only from a future date.
Accordingly, the petitioner is directed
to be released on bail
with effect from 5.3.2007, on his executing a bond for Rs.
twenty thousand only) with two solvent
sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of
J.F.C.M-I, Nedumangadu and subject to the following
(a). The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.
(b). The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police.
(c). The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.
(d). The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.
4. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. The application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR,
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.