Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M.FAISAL, S/O.MOHAMMED HANEEFA versus STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M.FAISAL, S/O.MOHAMMED HANEEFA v. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC - Bail Appl No. 1238 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 4507 (1 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1238 of 2007()

1. M.FAISAL, S/O.MOHAMMED HANEEFA,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :01/03/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 1238/2007 Dated this 1st day of March, 2007

O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the accused in Crime No.44/2007 of Parippally Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 294(b) and 353 IPC read with Section 149 IPC seeks anticipatory bail. The occurrence took place at 6.30 p.m on 7.2.2007.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Investigating Officer to release the petitioner on bail for a period of one month in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the Investigating officer and subject to the following conditions: B.A.1238/2007 2

(a). Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

(b). The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

(c). The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

(d). Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

(e). Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile.

4. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. The application is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs B.A.1238/2007 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.