Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SIRAJUDHEEN (A2) versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SIRAJUDHEEN (A2) v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 1247 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 4556 (1 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1247 of 2007()

1. SIRAJUDHEEN (A2),
... Petitioner

2. ANSAR (A3),

3. YUSUFF (A5),

4. AKBAR (A6),

5. NISHAD (A7),

6. ARAVINDAKSHAN (A8),

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.K.J.SAJI ISAAC

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :01/03/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 1247/2007 Dated this 1st day of March, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioners who are accused Nos. 2, 3 and 5 to 8 in Crime No.30/2007 of Perumpadappu police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 324 and 308 IPC read with Section 149 IPC, seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place at 8.45 p.m on 12.2.2007. The petitioners were arrested on 14.2.2007.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

3. Since the first petitioner who is the second accused in the case is said to have committed the offence at a time when he was on bail in Crime No.214/2006 granted by this Court in B.A.No.7229/2006 with a condition that he shall not commit any offence while on bail, he cannot be granted bail in the present case. But there is no reason why the other accused should not be granted bail.

4. Accordingly the petitioners 2 to 6 who are accused Nos. 3 and 5 to 8 are directed to be released on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like B.A.1247/2007 2 amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M, Ponnani, and subject to the following conditions:

(a). The petitioners 2 to 6 shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9

a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

(b). The petitioners 2 to 6 shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report.

(c). The petitioners 2 to 6 shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

(d). The petitioners 2 to 6 shall not commit any offence while on bail.

4. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. The application is allowed in part as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs B.A.1247/2007 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.