Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SIVAN versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SIVAN v. STATE OF KERALA - Crl Rev Pet No. 766 of 1998 [2007] RD-KL 4690 (5 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl Rev Pet No. 766 of 1998()

1. SIVAN
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.R.UDAYABHANU

Dated :05/03/2007

O R D E R

K.R.UDAYABHANU, J

CRL.R.P.No.766 of 1998

Dated this the 5th day of March, 2007

ORDER

Revision petitioner stands convicted for the offences under Sections 279 and 338 IPC and sentenced to R.I. for three months for the offence under Section 279 IPC and R.I. for three months for the offence under Section 338 IPC.

2. The prosecution case is that on 26.12.1993, at 1.30 P.M. in the noon time, accused drove his car in a rash and negligent manner and hit on a motor cyclist who was proceeding through the opposite direction. The evidence adduced consisted the testimony of PW's 1 to 6 and Exts. P1 to P7. The motor cyclist sustained injuries including head injury and fracture of both bones of right leg and other minor injuries. It has found that the car was driven through the wrong side. PW's 1 and 2 occurrence witness has identified the accused. It was also brought out that the car had no mechanical defect from the evidence of PW5, the AMVI and his report i.e., Ext. P5. Both the courts below have considered the evidence in detail and CRRP766/98 Page numbers convicted the revision petitioner/accused. On a consideration of the evidence adduced, I find that there is no reasons to interfere. The conviction is confirmed.

3. The counsel for the revision petitioner has sought for leniency. The incident has taken place in the year 1993 and more than a decade is over after the incident. In the circumstances, the sentence for the offence under Section 338 is modified to imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a compensation of Rs.10,000/- to PW1 vide Section 357(3) of Crl.P.C. and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. No separate sentence is to be awarded for the offence under Section 279 IPC. The revision petitioner shall appear before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chavakkad on 10.4.2007 to receive the sentence. The Criminal Revision Petition is disposed of as above. K.R.UDAYABHANU,

JUDGE

csl CRRP766/98 Page numbers

K.R.UDAYABHANU, J

Crl.R.P.No.929 of 1997

ORDER

CRRP766/98 Page numbers 26th February, 2007 CRRP766/98 Page numbers


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.