Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SIVADASAN, S/O ARUMUGHAN versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SIVADASAN, S/O ARUMUGHAN v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE - Bail Appl No. 1446 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 4941 (7 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1446 of 2007()

1. SIVADASAN, S/O ARUMUGHAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :07/03/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 1446/2007 Dated this 7th day of March, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner who is the second accused in Crime No.17/2007 of Nattukal Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 IPC read with Section 34 IPC with regard to the theft of brass equipments, copper pot, vessels etc., belonging to Sree Kalangottiri Bhagavathy Temple, Alanellur, seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 21.1.2007.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the offences and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M, Mannarkkad and subject to the following conditions:

(a). The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays. B.A.1446/2007 2

(b). The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report.

(c). The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

(d). The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

4. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. The application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs B.A.1446/2007 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.