Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.R.MANOJ KUMAR, S/O. RAVEENDRANATHAN versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.R.MANOJ KUMAR, S/O. RAVEENDRANATHAN v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 1385 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 4995 (8 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1385 of 2007()

1. K.R.MANOJ KUMAR, S/O. RAVEENDRANATHAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.C.B.SREEKUMAR

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :08/03/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 1385/2007 Dated this 8th day of March, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner who is the accused in Crime No.371/2006 of Koyipram Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 51, 52-A and 68-A of Copyright Act, 1957 for allegedly stocking thirty pirated CDs, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Even though the learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application, having regard to the fact that this Court has granted anticipatory bail in similar matters, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner as well.

3. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Investigating Officer to release the petitioner on bail for a period of one month in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the Investigating officer and subject to the following conditions:

(a). Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays. B.A.1385/2007 2

(b). The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

(c). The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

(d). Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

(e). Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile.

4. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. The application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs B.A.1385/2007 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.