Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHIBU, AGED 35 YERS, S/O.CHATHAN versus STATE OF KERALA (REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SHIBU, AGED 35 YERS, S/O.CHATHAN v. STATE OF KERALA (REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 1481 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 5041 (8 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1481 of 2007()

1. SHIBU, AGED 35 YERS, S/O.CHATHAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA (REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.S.RAJEEV

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :08/03/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 1481/2007 Dated this 8th day of March, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner, who is the third accused in Crime No.92/2002 of Binanipuram Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 353, 326 and 308 IPC read with Section 149 IPC, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Consequent on the non appearance of the petitioner in S.C.No.181/2005 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court (Ad hoc-II), Ernakulam, the case against him was split up and transferred to the long pending register as L.P.No.3/2006. Admittedly non bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. He would have it that the other accused in the case have been acquitted after trial in S.C.No.181/2005. That may be a relevant circumstance to be urged before the Trial Court.

3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a Court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the trial Court and seek regular bail. B.A.1481/2007 2

4. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the trial court namely Additional Sessions Court (Adhoc-II), Eranakulam, and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the Magistrate preferably on the same day on which it is filed, after considering the contentions of the petitioner that the co-accused in the case have been acquitted after trial. The application is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs B.A.1481/2007 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.