Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VALSALA.T.M., W/O.LATE versus M.M.JACOB (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


VALSALA.T.M., W/O.LATE v. M.M.JACOB (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME - Con Case(C) No. 235 of 2007(S) [2007] RD-KL 5268 (12 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Con Case(C) No. 235 of 2007(S)

1. VALSALA.T.M., W/O.LATE
... Petitioner

Vs

1. M.M.JACOB (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.GEORGE ABRAHAM

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES

Dated :12/03/2007

O R D E R

J.M.JAMES, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C.O.C No. 235 of 2007 in W.P.(C) No.26023/2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 12th day of March, 2007

O R D E R

In the judgment, dated 23/11/2006, in W.P.(C) No.26023/2006, this court ordered at paragraph (7) that:-

"7. In the above circumstances, I dispose of the writ petition, directing the first respondent to disburse the family pension, as would be calculated under clause 23 of the Pension Scheme, as early as possible, in any case, within two weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, before it."

2. It is complained of by the contempt petitioner that the direction of this Court had not been complied with, and, therefore, seeks an action under Section 12 of the Contempt Courts Act, 1971.

3. When the matter came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the petitioner had not complied with clause 23(4) of the Employees Self C.O.C.No.235/2007 Financing Pension Scheme and, therefore, the distribution of pension could not take place.

4. Sub clause (4) of clause 23 state that:- 'family pension shall not be granted to a widow or a widower, who has another living husband or wife.'

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the no objection from the other legal heirs, as well as the certificate, as required under clause 23(4), had already been submitted to the respondent. However, it is brought out that the same had been done only on 10/03/2007 by despatching through registered post.

6. In the above circumstances, I direct the respondent to comply with the direction contained in paragraph (7) of the judgment of this Court, dated 23/11/2006, in W.P(C) No.26023/2006, on or before 30th of this month. Contempt of Court case is closed accordingly. (J.M.JAMES) Judge ms


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.