BASTHICHAND, 51/240 CHILAVANNUR ROAD versus STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

BASTHICHAND, 51/240 CHILAVANNUR ROAD v. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE - Bail Appl No. 1608 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 5522 (16 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1608 of 2007()

1. BASTHICHAND, 51/240 CHILAVANNUR ROAD,
... Petitioner

2. NIRMALA DEVI, 51/240 CHILAVANNUR ROAD,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE
... Respondent

2. SHO, ALL WOMENS POLICE STATION,

3. SI OF POLICE, THEVARA POLICE STATION,

For Petitioner :SRI.SASITH PANICKER

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :16/03/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. Nos. 1569 and 1608 OF 2007 A ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Dated this the 16th day of March, 2007

O R D E R

In these applications the father-in-law, mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the defacto complainant Sunitha and who are respectively accused Nos.2, 3 and 4 in Crime No.2/2007 of All Women's Police Station, Pondicherry for offences punishable under sections 498A and 406 read with section 34 IPC and sections 3 to 7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The marriage between Sunitha and Vijay Kumar, the first accused, took place on 13.2.2005.

3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Investigating Officer to release the petitioners on bail for a period of one month in the event of their arrest in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions:  BA.1569&1608/07

a. Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

b. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

c. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

d. Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

aks 

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.