Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.K.SURESH KUMAR versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.K.SURESH KUMAR v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - WP(C) No. 8890 of 2007(G) [2007] RD-KL 5547 (16 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 8890 of 2007(G)

1. K.K.SURESH KUMAR,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER,

For Petitioner :SRI.M.V.BOSE

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

Dated :16/03/2007

O R D E R

K.K.DENESAN, J

W.P.(C)NO. 8890 of 2007

Dated this the 16th day of March, 2007



JUDGMENT

The petitioner is working as Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector in the Transport Department. It is contended that he is eligible to be promoted to the post of Motor Vehicle Inspector and from there to the post of Joint RTO. But his claim is not taken up for consideration since the respondents have not convened the meeting of the Departmental Promotion Committee, both lower and higher. Counsel submits that in the matter of convening the meeting of the DPC for selecting eligible persons for promotion to the higher categories, the respondents are bound by the statutory rules and since that duty has not been discharged, the petitioner had made a request as per Ext.P2 addressed to the first respondent. But nothing has been done so far.

2. Heard the Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. In the circumstances, there shall be an order directing W.P.(C)No. 8890/2007 :2: the respondents to fix the date for convening the DPC (lower) as also DPC (higher) for appointment to the post of Motor Vehicle Inspector and that of Joint Regional Transport Officer. The date thus fixed shall be communicated to the petitioner in reply to Ext.P2 representation. This shall be done within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment and a copy of the writ petition before respondents 1 and 2 for information and action.

K.K.DENESAN, JUDGE

css / W.P.(C)No. 8890/2007 :3: s W.P.(C)No. 8890/2007 :4:


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.