Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RIYAS, S/O SHAIK AHAMMED versus THE STATE OF KERALA(CRIME NO.71/03 OF

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RIYAS, S/O SHAIK AHAMMED v. THE STATE OF KERALA(CRIME NO.71/03 OF - Bail Appl No. 1603 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 5584 (16 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1603 of 2007()

1. RIYAS, S/O SHAIK AHAMMED,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE STATE OF KERALA(CRIME NO.71/03 OF
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :16/03/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 1603 OF 2007 A ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Dated this the 16th day of March, 2007

O R D E R

Petitioner, who is the 13th accused in Crime No.71/03 of Manjeshwar Police Station for offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 353 and 506(ii) read with sections 149 IPC, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.389/03 on the file of the CJM, Kasaragod, the case against him was split up and refiled as C.C.No.672/06. It was transferred to the Long Pending Register as L.P.C.No.192/06. Non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the CJM, Kasaragod and files an application for regular bail, within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably on the same date on which it is filed, after examining the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-appearance and also after considering his contention that the co-accused in the case has been acquitted after trial. This application is disposed of as above.

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

aks


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.