Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

T.CHANDRAN CHETTIAR, S/O.K.THANKAPPAN versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


T.CHANDRAN CHETTIAR, S/O.K.THANKAPPAN v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - WP(C) No. 9792 of 2007(N) [2007] RD-KL 5999 (22 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 9792 of 2007(N)

1. T.CHANDRAN CHETTIAR, S/O.K.THANKAPPAN
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE,

For Petitioner :SRI.R.SATISH KUMAR

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

Dated :22/03/2007

O R D E R

A.K. BASHEER, J.

W.P.(C). NO. 9792 OF 2007

Dated this the 22nd day of March, 2007



J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is stated to be working as Selection Grade Typist in the Revenue Department under the Government. His grievance is that the District wise seniority list of selection grade typists is not being published, with the result prospect of his promotion to the post of Fair Copy Superintendent has become unclear and uncertain. Petitioner has got a contention that he is the next person to be promoted to the category of Fair Copy Superintendent. I do not propose to deal with the above and other contentions raised by the petitioner at this stage in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner at the Bar. It is submitted that petitioner will be satisfied if an appropriate direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 representation submitted by the petitioner. Learned Government Pleader submits that an appropriate decision on Ext.P3 will be taken without any delay. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and pass WPC NO.9792/07 Page numbers orders on Ext.P3 representation strictly on its merit and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say, the petitioner shall be afforded sufficient opportunity to be heard before orders are passed by the 2nd respondent. Petitioner shall produce certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance.

A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE

vps WPC NO.9792/07 Page numbers

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE

OP NO.

JUDGMENT

21st DECEMBER, 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.