Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

T.R.SALILAM, W/O GOPALAKRISHNAN versus THE DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


T.R.SALILAM, W/O GOPALAKRISHNAN v. THE DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS - WP(C) No. 9728 of 2007(G) [2007] RD-KL 6000 (22 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 9728 of 2007(G)

1. T.R.SALILAM, W/O GOPALAKRISHNAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

Dated :22/03/2007

O R D E R

A.K. BASHEER, J.

W.P.(C). NO. 9728 OF 2007

Dated this the 22nd day of March, 2007



J U D G M E N T

The limited prayer in this writ petition, which is at the instance of a Revenue Inspector, who is working in Chavakkad Municipality, is to issue an appropriate direction to the respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation submitted by her expeditiously. The grievance of the petitioner appears to be that her request for transfer to her home District is being ignored and over looked while several of her juniors are being given such benefit in as much as they are being given promotion and transfer to stations of their choice. I do not propose to deal with the merit of the above contention at this stage in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner at the Bar. Learned Government Pleader submits that an appropriate decision on Ext.P3 will be taken without any delay especially since orders of general transfer are likely to be issued very soon.

2. In the above facts and circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 strictly on its merit and in WPC NO.9728/07 Page numbers accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that petitioner shall be afforded sufficient opportunity to be heard before orders are passed on Ext.P3 by the respondent. Petitioner shall produce certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the respondent for compliance.

A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE

vps WPC NO.9728/07 Page numbers

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE

OP NO.

JUDGMENT

21st DECEMBER, 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.