Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GOPINATHAN NAIR, AGED 54 YEARS versus STATE OF KERALA, REPD. BY PUBLIC

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


GOPINATHAN NAIR, AGED 54 YEARS v. STATE OF KERALA, REPD. BY PUBLIC - Crl MC No. 895 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 6044 (23 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 895 of 2007()

1. GOPINATHAN NAIR, AGED 54 YEARS,
... Petitioner

2. LEELAMMA, AGED 49 YEARS,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPD. BY PUBLIC
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.P.SANJAY

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :23/03/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J.

Crl.M.C.No.895 of 2007

Dated this the 23rd day of March 2007

O R D E R

The petitioners face allegations interalia under Section 315 of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. According to the petitioners, they are innocent. They cannot seek anticipatory bail in view of the bar under Section 18 of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They are prepared to surrender before the learned Magistrate. They apprehend that their application for bail may not be considered by the learned Magistrate on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously.

2. I find the apprehension to be totally baseless. This court has made it clear many times in Ali v. State of Kerala [2000(2) KLT 280, Shanu v. State of Kerala [2000(3) KLT 452, Krishnakumar v. State of Kerala [20005(1) KLD(Cri.)42] and P.P.Kader v. State of Kerala [2005(1) KLD(Cri.)250] that the mere fact that the offence under Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is triable by a court of Session would not justify abdication of powers by the learned Crl.M.C.No.895/07 2 Magistrates to consider the bail applications on merits. I do not also find any reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not consider the bail application on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. Sufficient general directions have already been issued in Alice George vs.Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1)KLT 339]. I have no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate is not aware of the law and will not follow the law.

3. In the result, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed but with the observation that if the petitioners surrender before the learned Magistrate and apply for bail, after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself unless there are exceptional and compelling reasons. Hand over copy of this order to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge. Crl.M.C.No.895/07 3 Crl.M.C.No.895/07 4

R.BASANT, J

C.R.R.P.No.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF JULY 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.