Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

LATHEESH P.M., S/O.RAGHAVAN versus THE S.H.O., KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


LATHEESH P.M., S/O.RAGHAVAN v. THE S.H.O., KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION - Bail Appl No. 1782 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 6077 (23 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1782 of 2007()

1. LATHEESH P.M., S/O.RAGHAVAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE S.H.O., KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION,
... Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA,

For Petitioner :SRI.M.K.SUMOD

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :23/03/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 1782/2007 Dated this 23rd day of March, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner, who is the husband of the defacto complainant and the fourth accused in Crime No.572/2000 of Kannur Town Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 323 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Consequent on the non appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.451/2000 on the file of the J.F.C.M-I, Kannur, the case against him was split up and re-filed as C.C.No.3/2004. The case has been transferred to the long pending register as L.P.No.75/2004. Non bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that the defacto complainant had subsequently obtained a divorce and has re-married. These are all matters which the petitioner may profitably raise before the Magistrate, after surrendering before him. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail.

3. Accordingly if the petitioner surrenders before the B.A.1782/2007 2 Magistrate and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed, after considering the contentions of the petitioner that the defacto complainant has since obtained a divorce and has re-married and has also begotten a child. The application is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.