Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RIJU THOMAS, S/O. THOMAS versus STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RIJU THOMAS, S/O. THOMAS v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 50 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 618 (9 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 50 of 2007()

1. RIJU THOMAS, S/O. THOMAS,
... Petitioner

2. BENNY, S/O.VARGHESE,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.C.C.THOMAS

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :09/01/2007

O R D E R

V.Ramkumar, J.


========================
B.A.No. 50 of 2007
========================

Dated this the 9th day of January,2007.

ORDER

Petitioners, who are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in CR No.97 of 2006 of Sulthan Batheri Excise Range for an offence punishable under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having transported 5600 litres of spirit on 9.11.2006 in a container lorry, seek their enlargement on bail.

2. Even though the learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application, he fairly submitted that no final report has been filed even after 60 days of judicial custody of the petitioners. If so, the petitioners are entitled to bail as of right by virtue of the proviso to Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.

3. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M.- I, Sulthan Batheri and subject to the following conditions:- BA 50/07 -: 2 :-

1. Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

3. Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

4. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. V.Ramkumar, Judge. ess 9/1


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.