Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHIBU, S/O. RAMANANDAN versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SHIBU, S/O. RAMANANDAN v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 1722 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 6238 (26 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1722 of 2007()

1. SHIBU, S/O. RAMANANDAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.B.MOHANLAL

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :26/03/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 1722/2007 Dated this 26th day of March, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner, who is the first accused in Crime No.104/2005 of Paravur Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 308, 323, 324 and 427 IPC read with Section 149 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 8.3.2005. Ever since then the petitioner was absconding. In execution of the warrants of arrest issued against the petitioner, he was arrested and produced before the Magistrate on 19.2.2007 and was remanded to judicial custody.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was in search of an employment in Mumbai and that is the reason why he could not appear before the Magistrate. He also submitted that the petitioner is prepared to face the trial and will not flee from justice. In the light of the willingness of the petitioner to stand trial, I am inclined to direct the Magistrate to grant bail to the petitioner in case he files a fresh application for regular bail.

3. Accordingly if the petitioner files a fresh application for regular bail before the Munsiff Magistrate, Paravur, he shall be B.A.1722/2007 2 released on bail on appropriate conditions, including one ensuring his availability for trial. The application is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.