Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

V.V.MOHAMMED,S/O.VEERAN,AGED 61 YEARS versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


V.V.MOHAMMED,S/O.VEERAN,AGED 61 YEARS v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER - WP(C) No. 10317 of 2007(C) [2007] RD-KL 6248 (26 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 10317 of 2007(C)

1. V.V.MOHAMMED,S/O.VEERAN,AGED 61 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
... Respondent

2. THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY

For Petitioner :SRI.P.DEEPAK

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

Dated :26/03/2007

O R D E R

THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No. 10317 of 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Dated this the 26th day of March, 2007.



JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges Ext.P2-Government order. His complaint is that he was not heard. According to him notice of hearing for the date 18.8.2006 was served on him only on 18.8.2006. I have perused Ext.P2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 1st respondent. Technically, to finally decide this issue, it should be necessary to refer to the files of the government. But then, the reference to the final determination order and final appellate order would show that the petitioner deserves one more opportunity of being heard.

2. Under such circumstances the impugned Ext. P2 is set aside on condition that the petitioner remits an amount of Rs.25,000/- to the 1st respondent within a period of 3 weeks from now. If such remittance is made, the 2nd respondent will take up the appeal on which Ext. P2 order is issued, will afford to the petitioner an opportunity of being heard in accordance with law, and will issue a decision without delay. The writ petition disposed of as above . THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN,

JUDGE.

jp


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.