Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DR.P.UNNEENKUTTY, READER IN COMMERCE versus STATE OF KERALA TO BE REP. SECRETARY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


DR.P.UNNEENKUTTY, READER IN COMMERCE v. STATE OF KERALA TO BE REP. SECRETARY - WP(C) No. 4462 of 2007(F) [2007] RD-KL 6536 (29 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 4462 of 2007(F)

1. DR.P.UNNEENKUTTY, READER IN COMMERCE,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA TO BE REP. SECRETARY,
... Respondent

2. DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,

3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE

4. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY

5. PRINCIPAL, FAROOK COLLEGE, CALICUT.

For Petitioner :SRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

Dated :29/03/2007

O R D E R

K.M.JOSEPH, J.

W.P.(C).No.4462 OF 2007

Dated this the 29th day of March, 2007



JUDGMENT

Complaint of the petitioner in brief is as follows: By Ext.P7, the fourth respondent placed the petitioner under Senior Scale with effect from 27-07-98. Vide Ext.P10 University granted its approval to the grant of selection grade to the petitioner with effect from 01/05/2003. By Ext.P11 University has granted approval to the appointment of the petitioner as Reader. However financial benefits are not forthcoming. According to the petitioner, the matter is covered by Ext.P13 judgment. He also relies on the decision reported in Cherian Mathew vs. Principal, S.B.College, Changanassery ( 1993(2)KLT 144).

2. I heard learned Government Pleader also.

3. The writ petition is disposed of as follows: The second respondent will file his objections to Exts.P7, WPC No.4462/07 2 P10 and P11 before the fourth respondent within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Thereupon, the fourth respondent will consider each and every objections meticulously and pass a reasoned order which shall be communicated to the petitioner and to the third respondent within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the objection. If the University reiterates its stand taken already in Exts.P7, P10 and P11, the matter will be governed by the decision in Cherian Mathew's case and the monetary benefits due to the petitioner will be disbursed to him without any further delay. K.M.JOSEPH

JUDGE

sv. WPC No.4462/07 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.