Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.V.CHANDRASEKHARAN, S/O.VASU versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.V.CHANDRASEKHARAN, S/O.VASU v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 2030 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 6564 (29 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 2030 of 2007()

1. K.V.CHANDRASEKHARAN, S/O.VASU,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K.

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :29/03/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 2030/2007 Dated this 29th day of March, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner, who is the accused in S.T.No.3476/2004 on the file of the J.F.C.M-III, Palakkad for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The above case was taken up for trial and stood posted to 13.10.2006 for the cross-examination of PW1 and adjourned to 20.11.2006. The petitioner would have it that his counsel had mistakenly noted the posting date as 13.11.2006 instead of 20.11.2006 and consequently on 20.11.2006, there was no representation, whereupon the Court below has issued non bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner.

3. The petitioner would submit that there was no willful latches or negligence on his part and non appearance on 20.11.2006 occurred due to the mistake committed by his counsel in wrongly noting the date of posting. Such being the position, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to seek regular bail from the J.F.C.M-III, Palakkad. B.A.2030/2007 2

4. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before that Court and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the petitioner shall be released on bail on appropriate conditions, after recalling warrants of arrest pending against him. Conditions of bail shall include one ensuring his continued appearance in the case. The application is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.