Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

S.ARUNKUMAR, S/O. SURYAKUMAR versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


S.ARUNKUMAR, S/O. SURYAKUMAR v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Crl MC No. 1030 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 6634 (29 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 1030 of 2007()

1. S.ARUNKUMAR, S/O. SURYAKUMAR,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :29/03/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J.

Crl.M.C.No.1030 of 2007

Dated this the 29th day of March 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner faces indictment for the bailable offence punishable under Sections 341 and 323 read with 34 I.P.C. The petitioner was released on bail at the crime stage. According to him, he did not receive any notice or summons from the court thereafter. Reckoning him as an absconder, the court has issued a non-bailable warrant to procure his presence. The petitioner now wants to surrender before the learned Magistrate. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner apprehends that his application for bail may not be considered on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously by the learned Magistrate. He, therefore, prays that directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. may be issued to the learned Magistrate to release the petitioner on bail when he appears and applies for bail.

2. It is for the petitioner to appear before the learned Magistrate and explain to the learned Magistrate, the circumstances under which he could not earlier appear before Crl.M.C.No.1030/07 2 the learned Magistrate. I find absolutely no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not consider the application for bail to be filed by the petitioner on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No special or specific directions appear to be necessary. Sufficient general directions have been issued in Alice George vs.Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1)KLT 339].

3. In the result, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed but with the specific observation that if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Magistrate and applies for bail, after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself. Hand over copy of this order to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge Crl.M.C.No.1030/07 3 Crl.M.C.No.1030/07 4

R.BASANT, J

C.R.R.P.No.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF JULY 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.