Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHYAMALA R,PANAVOORTHASTA VEEDU versus STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SHYAMALA R,PANAVOORTHASTA VEEDU v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS - WP(C) No. 10341 of 2007(F) [2007] RD-KL 6648 (29 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 10341 of 2007(F)

1. SHYAMALA R,PANAVOORTHASTA VEEDU,
... Petitioner

2. BABU R,THEKKEPARAMBIL VEEDU,VENPALAVATOM

3. RAVI K,NO.220,K.K.LANE,THIRUMALA P.O.

4. GIRIJA S,THOTTINKARA MUDIMBIL VEEDU,

5. GIRIJA B,ATTUVARAMBIL KATTACKAL VEEDU,

6. NABEEZA BEEVI,NAGALAYAM,KUZHIMVILA,

7. ANILKUMAR K,EDAPPALLIMADOM,PUTHOOR P.O.

8. R.MOHANAN NAIR,KOCHUVEEDU,PENGETTUKONAM,

9. G.LEVI,PUTHUVAL CHARUVILA MEKKEYVEEDU,

10. M.VIJAYAN,THADATHURIKATHU VEEDU,

11. SUGATHAN S,KAMALALAYAM,PINANGOTTUKUZHI,

12. M.SASIDHARAN,KADAYARA VEEDU,KAZHIVOOR

13. JAYANTHI S,S.S MANDIRAN,THUNDATHIL P.O,

14. K.AMMINI,KOYICKAL HOUE,MALMURI,

15. THANKAM B,SHALINI BHAVAN,

16. E.DEVADAS,NJARAVILA VEEDU,RUSSELPURAM

17. E.RAMESAN,KALLUVEETAMKUZHI VEEDU,

18. NIRMALA R,NULLUVILA VEEDU,SRICHITRA

19. RAMALEKSHMI,TC 23/1033,SISIRAM,

20. KUSALA KUMARI K.S,VIJAYA E-17,

21. MERY K.JOSE,POWATHEL HOUSE,NALACHIRA

22. P.K.RAJAMMA,THADATHIL KIZHAKKETHIL

23. CRISTAL LEELA K,VARATUPOTTA ROBI

24. MARIYA PRASANNA G.L,JOSE PRAKASH

25. CELINE M,D.M MANDIRAM,BHANU LANE,

26. INDIRA A,ROHINI NIVAS,PERINGAMALA,

27. JALAJAKUMARI B,VIMALA MANDIRAM,

28. PADMINI V,KIZHAKKUMKARA PUTHENVEEDU,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS
... Respondent

2. THE UNIVERSITY OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY

3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETRY,DEPARTMENT OF

For Petitioner :SRI.VELLAYANI SUNDARARAJU

For Respondent :SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UTY.

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

Dated :29/03/2007

O R D E R

K.M.JOSEPH, J.

W.P.(C).No.10341 OF 2007

Dated this the 29th day of March, 2007



JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to file a fresh writ petition. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh writ petition. K.M.JOSEPH

JUDGE

sv.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.