Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.CHANDRAN, AGICULTURAL INSTRUCTOR versus STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.CHANDRAN, AGICULTURAL INSTRUCTOR v. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY - WP(C) No. 11168 of 2007(D) [2007] RD-KL 6715 (30 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 11168 of 2007(D)

1. K.CHANDRAN, AGICULTURAL INSTRUCTOR,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,
... Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR,

3. G.PRAKASH, SUPERVISOR,

For Petitioner :SRI.A.SUDHI VASUDEVAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

Dated :30/03/2007

O R D E R

K.K.DENESAN, J.

WP(C)No. 11168 OF 2007 D

Dated this the 30th March, 2007.



JUDGMENT

The petitioner is working as Agricultural Instructor. He feels aggrieved by the promotion granted to the third respondent and others who are said to be juniors to him in the category of Agricultural Instructor. Ext.P6 order of promotion was passed by the second respondent on 6.3.2007 promoting Agricultural Instructors to the post of Deputy Superintendents Gr.I. The petitioner has filed Ext.P7 representation addressed to the first respondent-Government also, requesting to interfere in the matter and to direct the second respondent to promote the petitioner also with effect from the date of order of promotion granted to his junior. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the first respondent may be directed to pass early orders on Ext.P7.

2. Heard Govt. Pleader for respondents 1 and 2. In the nature of the order I propose to pass notice need not be issued to the third respondent. In the circumstances, there shall be an order directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P7 in the light of the relevant rules and the service particulars of the petitioner and the third respondent, take appropriate decision and communicate the order to the petitioner within one month from the date of WPC 11168/2007 2 receipt of a copy of the judgment. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment and copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for necessary action. K.K.DENESAN Judge jj


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.