Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P.NARAYANAN NAIR, S/O KRISHNAN NAIR versus SATE OF KERALA REP.BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P.NARAYANAN NAIR, S/O KRISHNAN NAIR v. SATE OF KERALA REP.BY - Crl MC No. 1061 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 6750 (30 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 1061 of 2007()

1. P.NARAYANAN NAIR, S/O KRISHNAN NAIR,
... Petitioner

2. GARDEN FRESH CONDIMENT REP.BY ITS

Vs

1. SATE OF KERALA REP.BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.M.THAMBAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :30/03/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J.

Crl.M.C.No.1061 of 2007

Dated this the 30th day of March 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner faces indictment in a prosecution for the offences punishable under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The petitioner had entered appearance and was enlarged on bail but later as there was no representation for the petitioner when the matter came up for trial, the learned Magistrate issued a non-bailable warrant to procure the presence of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, his absence earlier was not wilful and on account of reasons beyond his control. The petitioner now wants to surrender before the learned Magistrate. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner apprehends that his application for bail may not be considered on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously by the learned Magistrate. He, therefore, prays that the directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. may be issued to the learned Magistrate to release the petitioner on bail when he appears and applies for bail.

2. It is for the petitioner to appear before the learned Magistrate and explain to the learned Magistrate, the Crl.M.C.No.1061/07 2 circumstances under which he could not earlier appear before the learned Magistrate. I find absolutely no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not consider the application for bail to be filed by the petitioner on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No special or specific directions appear to be necessary. Sufficient general directions have been issued in Alice George vs.Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1)KLT 339].

3. In the result, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed but with the specific observation that if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Magistrate and applies for bail, after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself unless there are exceptional and compelling reasons. Hand over copy of this order to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge Crl.M.C.No.1061/07 3 Crl.M.C.No.1061/07 4

R.BASANT, J

C.R.R.P.No.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF JULY 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.