Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RIYAS,S/O MUHAMMADALI, PARACKAL HOUSE versus STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RIYAS,S/O MUHAMMADALI, PARACKAL HOUSE v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE - Bail Appl No. 1949 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 6759 (30 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1949 of 2007()

1. RIYAS,S/O MUHAMMADALI, PARACKAL HOUSE,
... Petitioner

2. FASIZ M., S/O.ABDULLA,

3. FAYIZ V.P., S/O.MUHAMMED,

4. AMEEN, S/O.MUHAMMADALI,

5. ANEESH, S/O.ABUBACKER,

6. LIJU C.K., S/O.NADI,

7. SALAM P., S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN,

8. RAJESH, THITTAYIL HOUSE,

9. NAZAR K.K., S/O.MAYIN,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

2. STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

For Petitioner :SRI.DILIP MOHAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :30/03/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 1949/2007 Dated this 30th day of March, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioners, who are accused Nos. 1 to 9 in Crime No.79/2007 of Pandikkad Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 324 and 326 IPC read with Section 149 IPC, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

3. The occurrence took place at about 6.30 p.m on 19.3.2007, pursuant to a football match in which the defacto complainant, who was the mediator in the quarrel which took place on the previous day, was assaulted with iron rod, pipe, cycle chain etc., resulting in his sustaining injuries including fracture of his leg.

4. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. There is no reason why the petitioners should not surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly if the petitioners surrender before the B.A.1949/2007 2 Magistrate and file applications for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which the applications are filed. The application is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.