Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SRI.RAJAN PANICKER, AGED 48 YEARS versus THE KOLLAM CORPORATION

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SRI.RAJAN PANICKER, AGED 48 YEARS v. THE KOLLAM CORPORATION - WP(C) No. 1680 of 2007(Y) [2007] RD-KL 6776 (30 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 1680 of 2007(Y)

1. SRI.RAJAN PANICKER, AGED 48 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE KOLLAM CORPORATION
... Respondent

2. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER,

For Petitioner :SRI.P.GOPAL

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :30/03/2007

O R D E R

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

W.P.(C) No. 1680 OF 2007

Dated this the 30th day of March, 2007



JUDGMENT

Sri.M.K.Chandramohan Das, Standing Counsel for the Corporation submits that after all, Ext.P2 is only a provisional order and the same will not be finalised before the Corporation considers Ext.P3 objections filed by the petitioner. But Mr.P.Gopal, counsel for the petitioner submits that even during the pendency of this Writ Petition, a building inspector attached to the Corporation on the basis of whose report Ext.P2 was issued, came over to the building and threatened the petitioner that the building will be demolished immediately.

2. Considering the submissions addressed before me, the Writ Petition will stand disposed of issuing the following directions: The Corporation will furnish a copy of the building inspector's report on the basis of which Ext.P2 provisional order was issued to the petitioner. Immediately thereafter, the Corporation will take up Ext.P3 objections and additional objections, if any, which may be submitted by the petitioner to Ext.P2, hear the petitioner on Ext.P3-objection and the additional objections and take a decision as to whether Ext.P2 should be finalised. If the Corporation decides to pass final orders directing WPC No. 1680/2007 2 demolition, those orders shall be communicated to the petitioner and the demolition shall be effected only after expiry of 7 days of communication of the order.

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE

btt WPC No. 1680/2007 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.