Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SATHEESHKUMAR, S/O. BHASKARAN versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SATHEESHKUMAR, S/O. BHASKARAN v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 1957 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 7073 (3 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1957 of 2007()

1. SATHEESHKUMAR, S/O. BHASKARAN,
... Petitioner

2. SREELAL @ KANNAN, S/O. SOMANKANI,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :03/04/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 1957/2007 Dated this 3rd day of April, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioners, who are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No.75/2007 of Palode Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC seek their enlargement on bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

3. The occurrence took place at 9.30 p.m on 4.3.2007, in the course of which 25 year old Aji was allegedly assaulted by the petitioners with a chopper and a stick resulting in his sustaining 33 injuries to which he succumbed on the next day.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the facts and circumstances of the case will only reveal an offence punishable under Part II of Section 302 IPC.

5. It is too early to come to any such conclusion. The deceased had sustained 33 injuries including severe head injuries inflicted on him with a chopper and a stick. Prima facie, I am not inclined to accept the above submission of the petitioners. B.A.1957/2007 2

6. Having regard to the nature of the injuries, the circumstances under which the injuries were sustained, the duration of the judicial custody of the petitioners and the present stage of the investigation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The application is accordingly dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.