Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KAREEM @ PUNCHAKKARAN KAREEM versus THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


KAREEM @ PUNCHAKKARAN KAREEM v. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 1984 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 7240 (9 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1984 of 2007()

1. KAREEM @ PUNCHAKKARAN KAREEM,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.BABU S. NAIR

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :09/04/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application Nos. 1984/2007 & 2046/2007 Dated this 9th day of April, 2007

O R D E R

The common petitioner in these applications for regular bail is the common first accused in Crime Nos.144/2007 and 145/2007 of Perinthalmanna Police Station. Crime No.144/2007 stands registered for offences punishable under Sections 376 and 506(i) IPC read with Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Crime No.145/2007 stand registered for offences punishable under Sections 447, 323, 324 and 506(i) IPC read with Section 34 IPC and also under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The petitioner surrendered before the J.F.C.M-I, Perinthalmanna on 23.3.2007 and was remanded to judicial custody where he continues.

2. In as much as the police custody of the petitioner was also given and potency test is also over, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the duration of judicial custody of the petitioner, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner only from a future date. B.A.1984 & 2046/2007 2

3. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from 16.4.2007, on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M-I, Perinthalmanna in each of the cases and subject to the following conditions:

(a). The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 am. and 11 am. on all Wednesdays.

(b). The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report.

(c). The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

(d). The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. B.A.1984 & 2046/2007 3

4. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. These applications are allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.