Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SAJEEV.S., S/O.SADANANDAN.R. versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SAJEEV.S., S/O.SADANANDAN.R. v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - WP(C) No. 11952 of 2007(W) [2007] RD-KL 7287 (9 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 11952 of 2007(W)

1. SAJEEV.S., S/O.SADANANDAN.R.,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER,

3. THE TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE,

4. THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST, MINING AND

5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.B.MOHANLAL

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

Dated :09/04/2007

O R D E R

S. SIRI JAGAN, J.

W.P.(C)NO. 11952 OF 2007

DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF APRIL, 2007



JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this court seeking the following reliefs.

"(i) issue a writ of mandamus or other writ or order or direction directing the respondents to forbear from interfering with or taking any coercive steps against the petitioner in respect of transport of River sand, metal chips and metal powder etc. from Tamil Nadu through the border Check Post in Kerala for sale in the State as per Ext.P1 Registration. (ii) To declare that the petitioner is entitled to transport of River sand, metal chips and metal powder etc. from Tamil Nadu through the border Check Post in Kerala for sale in the State as per Ext.P1 Registration. (iii) issue such other writ or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper on the facts and circumstances of this case." I am of opinion that no such general order can be issued when the petitioner has not even an allegation in the writ petition that any of his lorries have been detained by any of the respondents for any of the reasons alleged in the writ petition. This Court can interfere in the matter only when the respondents in violation of the law act to the prejudice of the petitioner. In the absence of any allegations in the writ petition that any of the respondents have done so, the petitioner cannot be granted any reliefs on the basis of such general prayers. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd W.P.(c)11952/07 2


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.